<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Better HAProxy Health Check For Dynamic Websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iamseanmurphy.com/2009/04/22/a-better-haproxy-health-check-for-dynamic-websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iamseanmurphy.com/2009/04/22/a-better-haproxy-health-check-for-dynamic-websites/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, news, code by Sean Murphy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:16:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pradeep</title>
		<link>http://iamseanmurphy.com/2009/04/22/a-better-haproxy-health-check-for-dynamic-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Pradeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamseanmurphy.com/2009/04/22/a-better-haproxy-health-check-for-dynamic-websites/#comment-943</guid>
		<description>Hey, So is there a way to process the health file as well after it is received by haproxy. Like my health.php tries to connect to a database, if it can&#039;t then it sends a &quot;I&#039;m not healthy&quot;. Can i tell the differences between these two?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, So is there a way to process the health file as well after it is received by haproxy. Like my health.php tries to connect to a database, if it can&#8217;t then it sends a &#8220;I&#8217;m not healthy&#8221;. Can i tell the differences between these two?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://iamseanmurphy.com/2009/04/22/a-better-haproxy-health-check-for-dynamic-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 16:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamseanmurphy.com/2009/04/22/a-better-haproxy-health-check-for-dynamic-websites/#comment-941</guid>
		<description>I have a similar setup, only my intermediate layer is sTunnel converting http to https but not the reverse. This effectively severs all contact between HAProxy and the greand-children processes. Any ideas how I could get round this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a similar setup, only my intermediate layer is sTunnel converting http to https but not the reverse. This effectively severs all contact between HAProxy and the greand-children processes. Any ideas how I could get round this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Murphy</title>
		<link>http://iamseanmurphy.com/2009/04/22/a-better-haproxy-health-check-for-dynamic-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamseanmurphy.com/2009/04/22/a-better-haproxy-health-check-for-dynamic-websites/#comment-408</guid>
		<description>Thanks, I&#039;m glad you liked it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I&#8217;m glad you liked it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: till</title>
		<link>http://iamseanmurphy.com/2009/04/22/a-better-haproxy-health-check-for-dynamic-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>till</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamseanmurphy.com/2009/04/22/a-better-haproxy-health-check-for-dynamic-websites/#comment-406</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say thanks for posting. You gave me a good idea. I just thought about the same problem today -- how do you manage to track php-cgi, sans nginx. Just because nginx never went down for us, but php-cgi gives you more of an indicator when a server is overloaded. Anyway, kudos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say thanks for posting. You gave me a good idea. I just thought about the same problem today &#8212; how do you manage to track php-cgi, sans nginx. Just because nginx never went down for us, but php-cgi gives you more of an indicator when a server is overloaded. Anyway, kudos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iee</title>
		<link>http://iamseanmurphy.com/2009/04/22/a-better-haproxy-health-check-for-dynamic-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>iee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamseanmurphy.com/2009/04/22/a-better-haproxy-health-check-for-dynamic-websites/#comment-402</guid>
		<description>there must be some web-based services like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there must be some web-based services like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

